‘Atrociously Awful’: Dems Approval Ratings Crash Within Their Own Party
‘Atrociously Awful’: Dems Approval Ratings Crash Within Their Own Party
New polling data highlighted by Harry Enten suggests growing dissatisfaction among Democratic voters with their party’s congressional leadership, raising concerns ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.
Speaking on CNN, Enten pointed to a sharp decline in net approval ratings for Democratic congressional leaders among Democrats themselves. According to the data, internal approval has fallen from positive territory in previous election cycles to negative levels, signaling a notable shift in sentiment within the party.
“In 2006, Democrats’ net approval of their congressional leaders was strongly positive, and even as recently as the last midterm it remained well above zero,” Enten said. “Now, the bottom has fallen out.”
The polling also indicates broader dissatisfaction with Democratic leadership priorities. Roughly three-quarters of respondents overall said congressional Democrats have the wrong priorities, while only about one-quarter said they have the right ones.
Notably, that skepticism extends to Democratic-leaning voters. Among Democrats and independents who lean Democratic, a majority expressed doubts about whether party leaders are focused on the right issues. Enten characterized the findings as a warning sign that could lead to increased primary challenges within the party.
“These numbers are just awful,” he said, adding that the data “screams primary challenges.”
Separate national polling reinforces concerns about the Democratic Party’s broader standing with voters. According to recent averages compiled by RealClearPolitics, Democrats hold a net favorability rating of approximately -20 points, with a majority of Americans viewing the party unfavorably.
By comparison, President Donald J. Trump also maintains a negative approval rating, though slightly less severe in some surveys. Polling cited from Quinnipiac University found Trump’s approval at around -18 points, while the Democratic Party favorability was even lower.
Additional data from a Yahoo News/YouGov survey showed similar trends, with both Trump and Democrats underwater nationally. However, the surveys indicate Republicans remain more unified in their support for Trump than Democrats are for their own party.
Among Republican voters, Trump’s approval ratings remain overwhelmingly positive, while Democratic voters show comparatively lower levels of enthusiasm for their party. Analysts view this gap in internal cohesion as a potential vulnerability for Democrats.
Despite these challenges, Democrats continue to show strength in some key political indicators. Multiple polls give the party an advantage on the generic congressional ballot, suggesting they remain competitive in the fight for control of Congress. In the Yahoo News/YouGov poll, Democrats led by four points, while the Quinnipiac survey showed an even wider margin.
Democrats have also notched a series of special election victories in districts previously carried by Trump, pointing to continued electoral competitiveness despite broader favorability concerns.
The mixed polling landscape presents a complex picture as both parties look ahead to the 2026 midterms. While Democrats face internal dissatisfaction and weak favorability ratings, they continue to perform well in certain electoral tests. Republicans, meanwhile, show stronger internal unity but face their own challenges with independent voters.
For Democratic leadership, the emerging data underscores a key tension: maintaining voter support within their own coalition while appealing to a broader electorate in a highly polarized political environment.
As the midterm cycle approaches, how party leaders respond to these internal concerns could play a significant role in shaping candidate fields, campaign strategies, and ultimately, election outcomes.
SHOWDOWN ON THE FIVE: Jessica Tarlov Drops Truth Bomb on GOP’s Controversial Voter Legislation
SHOWDOWN ON THE FIVE: Jessica Tarlov Drops Truth Bomb on GOP’s Controversial Voter Legislation
WASHINGTON — A ferocious battle over the soul of American democracy erupted on cable news this week, proving once again that the clash over election integrity is reaching a boiling point.
During a high-stakes segment on Fox News' top-rated program The Five, liberal co-host Jessica Tarlov ignited an intense firestorm by sounding the alarm on the Republican-backed SAVE Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act).
Her warning was sharp, direct, and unapologetic: This isn't just a simple Voter ID bill—it’s a bureaucratic roadblock designed to keep millions of legal Americans away from the ballot box.
"Far Beyond Voter ID": Tarlov Sounds the Alarm
While GOP proponents frame the SAVE Act as a common-sense measure to restore trust in elections, Tarlov shredded that narrative live on air, dissecting the fine print of the proposed federal mandate.
Under the bill, anyone registering to vote in federal elections would be legally required to provide documentary proof of U.S. citizenship—such as a physical U.S. passport, a certified birth certificate, or naturalization papers.
"People hear 'Voter ID' and think it’s just showing a driver's license at the counter," Tarlov argued. "It’s not. This bill demands physical proof of citizenship upfront. Millions of everyday, hard-working American citizens do not have a valid passport sitting in a drawer or immediate access to an official birth certificate. This creates an artificial barrier to a fundamental constitutional right." without instant paperwork access.
Integrity Guardrail or Voter Suppression? The Great Debate
The fiery television debate reflects a massive political rift tearing through Capitol Hill and statehouses across the country.
The Conservative Defense: Republican sponsors and conservative commentators insist the measure is vital to national security and sovereign elections. They argue that verifying citizenship at registration is a necessary safeguard to prevent non-citizens from ever slipping onto federal voter rolls.
The Progressive Pushback: Critics like Tarlov argue that non-citizen voting in federal elections is already illegal, strictly policed, and exceptionally rare. Opponents caution that adding heavy administrative hurdles will unintentionally disenfranchise lawful voters—particularly students, low-income citizens, rural voters, and women whose names have changed due to marriage.
The Stakes Couldn't Be Higher
As the debate over voter access versus election security intensifies, the SAVE Act has turned into a major political litmus test.
Is requiring physical proof of citizenship a mandatory protection to guarantee that every vote is lawful? Or is it an unnecessary, red-tape nightmare that punishes legal citizens for not having their paperwork in order?
One thing is certain: as long as voices like Jessica Tarlov continue to push back on prime-time television, the fight over who gets to vote—and how hard it is to do so—is far from over.
Jessica Tarlov Says Trump Has 35% Approval Rating in Most Polls
Supporters of the bill strongly disagree, saying it is designed to protect election integrity by preventing non-citizens from registering to vote. Opponents argue the existing safeguards are already sufficient and fear the measure could unintentionally disenfranchise lawful voters. Is the SAVE Act a necessary election safeguard, or does it create unnecessary barriers to voting?
Jessica Tarlov Suspended Indefinitely After Allegedly Assaulting Fox News Crew Member
Jessica Tarlov Suspended Indefinitely After Allegedly Assaulting Fox News Crew Member
NEW YORK — The set of Fox News’ hit show The Five has seen its fair share of heated shouting matches, but what went down behind the scenes this week turned a political debate into an outright crime scene.
In a shocking move that has sent shockwaves through Manhattan media circles, network executives have suspended co-host Jessica Tarlov indefinitely following an alleged physical assault on a crew member during a commercial break.
The reason for the explosive violent outburst? A camera operator made the fatal mistake of laughing out loud at one of her political talking points.
The Laugh That Triggered a Rampage
According to multiple insider accounts and studio witnesses, the situation escalated with terrifying speed. During a taped segment discussing presidential leadership, Tarlov aggressively defended President Joe Biden, passionately declaring him to be "one of the most alert and engaged presidents in American history."
While her conservative co-hosts on The Five usually counter her hot takes with eye-rolls and sharp rebuttals, it was an off-camera crew member who couldn't hold back.
A veteran camera operator reportedly chuckled out loud at the statement—a moment of candid disbelief that pushed Tarlov entirely over the edge.
"She just flew completely off the handle," one studio staffer revealed under the condition of anonymity. "Jessica has always been hyper-sensitive to pushback, but this was different. The moment she heard that laugh, her face changed. She lost control, lunged at the crew member, and turned physically aggressive. It took two floor managers to pull her off."
Fox News Responds: A Mandatory "Cooling-Off" Period
Network executives acted swiftly to control the fallout. Within hours of the incident, Tarlov was escorted from the building and informed of her immediate, indefinite suspension.
While the network hasn't closed the door permanently—noting they will consider a formal appeal at a later date—the consensus inside the building is clear: She is out for the foreseeable future.
In a internal memo, management framed the suspension as a mandatory "cooling-off period" to review safety protocols and investigate the physical altercation. However, staff members say the atmosphere on set remains deeply rattled.
Beyond Political Delusion: When Rhetoric Turns Violent
Political commentators across social media were quick to seize on the scandal. For years, Tarlov served as the resident liberal voice on The Five, regularly taking fire from a panel of staunch conservatives. But critics argue that defending the indefensible finally broke her composure.
To many viewers, claiming Biden was "sharp and alert" in 2024 or 2025 was already seen as an exercise in extreme political bias—but resorting to physical violence when called out on it marks a dangerous new low.
"This isn't just about partisan bias anymore," noted one media analyst following the story. "When a commentator becomes so consumed by political delusion that a simple chuckle triggers a physical assault, you've crossed a line from political debate into total instability."
What’s Next for The Five?
As Fox News searches for a temporary replacement to fill the liberal chair, the network faces intense scrutiny over workplace safety and on-set decorum.
Will Jessica Tarlov ever walk back onto the set of The Five, or has the "token leftist" finally burned her last bridge in cable news?
This story is actively developing. Scroll down to view real-time updates, legal analysis of the alleged assault, and reaction clips from around the media world!
