Fox News Viewers Are Calling For Jesse Watters To Be Fired After His Latest Controversial Moment
Fox News Viewers Are Calling For Jesse Watters To Be Fired After His Latest Controversial Moment
Jesse Waters has worked with Fox News for years. However, he recently sparked debate on social media concerning comments made in light of a certain current event. Some commenters have even discussed Watters’ future on the show.
Jesse Waters Has Been Hosting His Own Primetime Series Since 2022
Watters is a political commentator and host known for his work with various Fox News shows. Early in his career, he became known for appearing on The O’Reilly Factor. This led to his own segment, “Watters’ World,” which eventually spun off into its own show.
In 2017, Watters also became known for co-hosting The Five. By 2022, he also became the host of his own New York City-based program, Jesse Watters Primetime.
During the past Tuesday episode of Primetime, Watters backed President Donald Trump’s insistence that the current Venezuela operation is dissimilar to the Iraq War. During the episode, Watters played a clip of MS Now‘s Joe Scarborough sharing a recent conversation in which Trump said the difference between Iraq and Venezuela would be that he will be “keeping the oil.”
On Morning Joe, Scarborough shared, “I asked him, I said, ‘Mr. President, when you say, quote, we’re going to run everything that obviously causes deep concerns because of the disaster in Iraq. The president’s response, ‘Joe, the difference between Iraq and this is that Bush didn’t keep the oil. We’re going to keep the oil.’”
As previously reported, Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and his wife were captured by U.S. forces and are facing charges of narco-terrorism. For the time being, Trump has claimed that the United States will “run” the South American country. This, in turn, has led critics to ask if this action could start a war.
For his part, Watters has criticized claims that Trump’s declarations about Venezuela’s oil are “imperialistic.” As he argued, “Trump says, ‘take the oil,’ Democrats call that imperialistic. We call it common sense. You know, we won spoils after World War II. We told our allies, lose the colonies.”
Watters’ Comments Concerning Somewhere Up North Got A Few Responses Online
Watters continued, “We’ve neglected our own neighborhood for the last 25 years because we were stuck in the sand in Iraq and Afghanistan. And while we were there, China swooped into our backyard and turned out all of our neighbors.”
However, one comment from Watters that especially got commenters talking was a suggestion concerning the United States’ relationship with a Northern territory. At one point, he shared, “Maybe we use the oil money from Venezuela to buy Greenland,” even suggesting to “share it with the Danes.”
As noted by CNN, the idea of U.S. interest in Greenland dates back to the 19th century. The Secretary of State William H. Seward was interested in buying Greenland after the purchase of Alaska in 1867. U.S. interest in the territory has since resurfaced over the years. At one point, the U.S. was interested in making a swap with Denmark for Greenland, using territory in the Philippines.
Many viewers responded to Watters’ recent comments concerning Greenland on social media platforms, including X. Many debated the ethics, while others speculated if such an idea could even take place. Some comments included:
“This complete and utter moron. Greenland doesn’t want to be bought by the US. They don’t want to join this s*******. Ffs.”
“Maybe Fox News could use the money it saves from firing Watters and hire a journalist.”
“They seem to think Greenland is for sale and if it was the agreement in place with Denmark is the UK has the first option to buy it.”
“Greenland isn’t optional—it’s the shield over North America. Watters is right: strategic assets like Greenland’s missile-intercept position and Venezuela’s oil are non-negotiable for U.S. security.”
What is your reaction to this recent episode of Jesse Watters Primetime? Have you been following this story? Make sure you come back to TV Shows Ace for all the latest TV and celebrity news.
SHOWDOWN ON THE FIVE: Jessica Tarlov Drops Truth Bomb on GOP’s Controversial Voter Legislation
SHOWDOWN ON THE FIVE: Jessica Tarlov Drops Truth Bomb on GOP’s Controversial Voter Legislation
WASHINGTON — A ferocious battle over the soul of American democracy erupted on cable news this week, proving once again that the clash over election integrity is reaching a boiling point.
During a high-stakes segment on Fox News' top-rated program The Five, liberal co-host Jessica Tarlov ignited an intense firestorm by sounding the alarm on the Republican-backed SAVE Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act).
Her warning was sharp, direct, and unapologetic: This isn't just a simple Voter ID bill—it’s a bureaucratic roadblock designed to keep millions of legal Americans away from the ballot box.
"Far Beyond Voter ID": Tarlov Sounds the Alarm
While GOP proponents frame the SAVE Act as a common-sense measure to restore trust in elections, Tarlov shredded that narrative live on air, dissecting the fine print of the proposed federal mandate.
Under the bill, anyone registering to vote in federal elections would be legally required to provide documentary proof of U.S. citizenship—such as a physical U.S. passport, a certified birth certificate, or naturalization papers.
"People hear 'Voter ID' and think it’s just showing a driver's license at the counter," Tarlov argued. "It’s not. This bill demands physical proof of citizenship upfront. Millions of everyday, hard-working American citizens do not have a valid passport sitting in a drawer or immediate access to an official birth certificate. This creates an artificial barrier to a fundamental constitutional right." without instant paperwork access.
Integrity Guardrail or Voter Suppression? The Great Debate
The fiery television debate reflects a massive political rift tearing through Capitol Hill and statehouses across the country.
The Conservative Defense: Republican sponsors and conservative commentators insist the measure is vital to national security and sovereign elections. They argue that verifying citizenship at registration is a necessary safeguard to prevent non-citizens from ever slipping onto federal voter rolls.
The Progressive Pushback: Critics like Tarlov argue that non-citizen voting in federal elections is already illegal, strictly policed, and exceptionally rare. Opponents caution that adding heavy administrative hurdles will unintentionally disenfranchise lawful voters—particularly students, low-income citizens, rural voters, and women whose names have changed due to marriage.
The Stakes Couldn't Be Higher
As the debate over voter access versus election security intensifies, the SAVE Act has turned into a major political litmus test.
Is requiring physical proof of citizenship a mandatory protection to guarantee that every vote is lawful? Or is it an unnecessary, red-tape nightmare that punishes legal citizens for not having their paperwork in order?
One thing is certain: as long as voices like Jessica Tarlov continue to push back on prime-time television, the fight over who gets to vote—and how hard it is to do so—is far from over.
Jessica Tarlov Says Trump Has 35% Approval Rating in Most Polls
Supporters of the bill strongly disagree, saying it is designed to protect election integrity by preventing non-citizens from registering to vote. Opponents argue the existing safeguards are already sufficient and fear the measure could unintentionally disenfranchise lawful voters. Is the SAVE Act a necessary election safeguard, or does it create unnecessary barriers to voting?
Jessica Tarlov Suspended Indefinitely After Allegedly Assaulting Fox News Crew Member
Jessica Tarlov Suspended Indefinitely After Allegedly Assaulting Fox News Crew Member
NEW YORK — The set of Fox News’ hit show The Five has seen its fair share of heated shouting matches, but what went down behind the scenes this week turned a political debate into an outright crime scene.
In a shocking move that has sent shockwaves through Manhattan media circles, network executives have suspended co-host Jessica Tarlov indefinitely following an alleged physical assault on a crew member during a commercial break.
The reason for the explosive violent outburst? A camera operator made the fatal mistake of laughing out loud at one of her political talking points.
The Laugh That Triggered a Rampage
According to multiple insider accounts and studio witnesses, the situation escalated with terrifying speed. During a taped segment discussing presidential leadership, Tarlov aggressively defended President Joe Biden, passionately declaring him to be "one of the most alert and engaged presidents in American history."
While her conservative co-hosts on The Five usually counter her hot takes with eye-rolls and sharp rebuttals, it was an off-camera crew member who couldn't hold back.
A veteran camera operator reportedly chuckled out loud at the statement—a moment of candid disbelief that pushed Tarlov entirely over the edge.
"She just flew completely off the handle," one studio staffer revealed under the condition of anonymity. "Jessica has always been hyper-sensitive to pushback, but this was different. The moment she heard that laugh, her face changed. She lost control, lunged at the crew member, and turned physically aggressive. It took two floor managers to pull her off."
Fox News Responds: A Mandatory "Cooling-Off" Period
Network executives acted swiftly to control the fallout. Within hours of the incident, Tarlov was escorted from the building and informed of her immediate, indefinite suspension.
While the network hasn't closed the door permanently—noting they will consider a formal appeal at a later date—the consensus inside the building is clear: She is out for the foreseeable future.
In a internal memo, management framed the suspension as a mandatory "cooling-off period" to review safety protocols and investigate the physical altercation. However, staff members say the atmosphere on set remains deeply rattled.
Beyond Political Delusion: When Rhetoric Turns Violent
Political commentators across social media were quick to seize on the scandal. For years, Tarlov served as the resident liberal voice on The Five, regularly taking fire from a panel of staunch conservatives. But critics argue that defending the indefensible finally broke her composure.
To many viewers, claiming Biden was "sharp and alert" in 2024 or 2025 was already seen as an exercise in extreme political bias—but resorting to physical violence when called out on it marks a dangerous new low.
"This isn't just about partisan bias anymore," noted one media analyst following the story. "When a commentator becomes so consumed by political delusion that a simple chuckle triggers a physical assault, you've crossed a line from political debate into total instability."
What’s Next for The Five?
As Fox News searches for a temporary replacement to fill the liberal chair, the network faces intense scrutiny over workplace safety and on-set decorum.
Will Jessica Tarlov ever walk back onto the set of The Five, or has the "token leftist" finally burned her last bridge in cable news?
This story is actively developing. Scroll down to view real-time updates, legal analysis of the alleged assault, and reaction clips from around the media world!
