Soft

Chapter 19 - The criminal charges

Michael and Patricia faced different charges based on their roles.

Unlawful restraint or confinement.

Domestic-violence-related offenses.

Assaultive conduct connected to nonconsensual administration through the tube.

Evidence-related issues.

Michael’s filming created additional privacy questions, though not every disgusting act of recording fit neatly into a criminal statute.

Prosecutors did not charge attempted murder.

Good.

I did not want dramatic charges that evidence could not support.

The lock was straightforward.

The tube conduct more medically complex.

Toxicologists testified about risk without pretending exact outcomes.

Patricia’s nursing background cut both directions.

Her defense:

She believed she was providing care based on experience.

Prosecution:

Her training gave her reason to understand that patient consent and prescribed regimens matter.

Michael’s defense emphasized:

Medical crisis.

Fear for unborn child.

My prior consent to some filming.

My lies to doctors when asked whether the regimen changed and whether I was safe.

Yes.

They used my own words.

That hurt.

My attorney prepared me.

“You said no to the doctor.”

“Yes.”

“Why?”

“I was afraid.”

“That explains. They will still ask.”

They did.

I answered.

No embellishment.

No:

I was physically unable to tell.

I had been able.

May you like

I chose not to because I feared what would happen when we got home.

That was the truth.

Related Stories

Other posts